Climate change and the psyche – audio

I came across this fascinating podcast about climate change and the psyche earlier this week. It was originally aired on ABC Radio’s All In The Mind programme on 21st November 2009, shortly before COP-15.

It features interviews with two speakers, climate scientist Mike Hulme (author of Why We Disagree About Climate Change) and anthropologist Jonathan Marshall (editor of the new book Depth Psychology; Disorder and Climate Change, a provocative collection of Jungian perspectives on the topic. They join host Natasha Mitchell to discuss mythology, mental ecology and a changing climate.

INTERVIEWEES
Jonathan Marshall
Anthropologist, and research fellow
University of Technology Sydney
Sydney, Australia

Mike Hulme
Former and founding director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research
Professor of Climate Change
School of Environmental Sciences
University of East Anglia UK

PUBLICATIONS
Why We Disagree About Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity
Author: Mike Hulme
Publisher: Cambridge University Press, 2009
ISBN 978-0-521-89869-0

Depth Psychology; Disorder and Climate Change
Author: Edited by Jonathan Marshall
Publisher: Jung Downunder Books, 2009
ISBN 978-0-9806752-0-7

Psychology and Global Climate Change: Addressing a Multi-faceted Phenomenon and Set of Challenges
Author: A Report by the American Psychological Association’s Task Force on the Interface between psychology and Global Climate Change
Publisher: American Psychological Association, 2009

Share

What Abraham Lincoln can contribute to our thinking about climate change

“The dogmas of the quiet past are inadequate to the stormy present. The occasion is piled high with difficulty, and we must rise – with the occasion. As our case is new, so we must think anew, and act anew. We must disenthrall ourselves, and then we shall save our country”.

-Abraham Lincoln 1862

Lincoln made this statement during his country’s civil war, at a time when he was advocating compensated emancipation for the South’s slaves.

Abraham Lincoln - "As our case is new, so we must think anew, and act anew."

Abraham Lincoln - "As our case is new, so we must think anew, and act anew."

What he was hinting at is of supreme relevance to us now – that we are currently in the midst of a situation that we have never encountered before. And because that is where we find ourselves, our thinking may not be up to the task. Why not you might ask? Because many of us have developed our beliefs, habitual thinking patterns and view of ourselves in the world at a time when the (environmental / climate) issues were different to what they are now (even if that was only 20 or 30 years ago).

So what is our new situation? For the first time in recorded human history, we are approaching or already beyond the absolute carrying capacity of our planet. The climate system’s decreasing ability to buffer changes in atmospheric gas concentrations is paralleled by the decreasing availability of arable land, fresh water and food production.

For many people that is a new concept, and one that is difficult to comprehend if one has always believed that this planet’s bounty was infinite. Why might we think that way? When there were fewer of us, and living standards were generally lower, it did seem like we lived on an infinite planet. There was more than enough to go around. But unfortunately not any more. Anthropogenic climate change is just one of the symptoms. But one that most of us are poorly equipped intellectually to deal with.

Image credit: Wikimedia.

Share

What Do We Have To Do To Convince the Public That Climate Change is Real?

Recent US research (also quoted here) shows that less people believe that climate change is real compared to last year.

Less people now believe that climate change is real

Less people now "believe" that climate change is real

Over the same period, there has been a comparable decline in the proportion of Americans who say global temperatures are rising as a result of human activity, such as burning fossil fuels. Just 36% say that currently, down from 47% last year.

Research in the UK and Canada shows similar trends.

Less people believe it but the effects of global waming are accelerating

Less people believe it but the effects of global waming are accelerating

So what do we have to do to convince people that we need to cut GHG emissions? It reminds me of the smoking debate. Both invoke public health issues. Both have solid science behind them. And for both, BELIEF was everything.

I know that many people have written about this before, but changing people’s attitudes and behaviour probably needs to be done using a behaviour-change model such as that used in health promotion and medicine.

For instance see these two abstracts:

The dynamics of belief in climate change and its risks in business organisations.

Climate change: Motivation for taking measure to adapt

Unfortunately the science alone is not enough. It may SEEM that way to scientists but it is not enough for the general public. We have to MARKET climate change and SELL it to the masses.

We have to if we are going to achieve meaningful change.

The anti-climate change lobby is crafting messages to achieve an emotional outcome – we have to as well.

So this conference is trying to do just that – and strangely enough it’s on next week: BEHAVIOR, ENERGY & CLIMATE CHANGE CONFERENCE. Looks like it’s too late to register to attend but you can download the program and all the abstracts (which together forms a sort of topic / study guide) plus there is limited webinar registration available until tomorrow.

New conference on climate change and behaviour

New conference on climate change and behaviour

Just In: Download articles on climate change and resilience from Resurgence Magazine.

Share